It's the thexy nerdy pupper!

With plan "C what a prison pocket can also hold"!

emeralddragon2 said:
It's the thexy nerdy pupper!

With plan "C what a prison pocket can also hold"!

Nice.

Sweetie, jail isn't co-ed...

someduderandy said:
Sweetie, jail isn't co-ed...

There are still plenty of jails with female inmates and males on the guard and administrative staff... and not all female guard and administrative staff are well-behaved or bothered by things like, y'know, laws or morality.

Why are these being tagged as young?? :/

hellpad said:
Why are these being tagged as young?? :/

Because "young" is a stupidly ambiguous tag that can apply to any character who's under eighteen, be they an infant or seventeen years and three-hundred sixty-four days. We do not have a good tag for characters who're ambiguously close to being adults like Phoebe here. The closest we get is "adolescent", which nobody uses, but means 13-17 (which is why nobody uses it because holy hell those are vastly different in a porn context). This vastly over-broad umbrella tag seems to have replaced "cub", which meant characters who're visibly underage (unlike Phoebe here) and wouldn't show up on something like this most of the time.

That's a moot point anyway, though - her ref sheet over on post #4982764 shows that she is canonically nineteen years old, which means that going by the text of the definition of the "young" tag, she does not qualify for it... except that the wording of the definition allows for arbitrary decisions that a character "looks" like she could be slightly under eighteen and this site goes by "tag what you see" rules, so her canon age doesn't matter to the rules anyway.

Omg this girl is ridiculously hot.

Wait, is she still trying to fuck the mannequin?

hellpad said:
Why are these being tagged as young?? :/

Because tagging here is crowd-sourced and most of the crowd never reads or follows the guidelines. The entire system is absurdly subjective and practically useless the moment any tagging gets close to age, size, or body composition.

We gotta get this sexy woman some thick juicy meat stat!

Also can we talk about how beautiful she looks without glasses? G... guh... @////@

Y'know, jail really is an infinite sex glitch if you think about it

hel0 said:
We gotta get this sexy woman some thick juicy meat stat!

Also can we talk about how beautiful she looks without glasses? G... guh... @////@

She's beautiful with or without the glasses. Tho I still prefer her with glasses, tbh

Something about undressing is really pleasing

mustardegenerate said:
Because "young" is a stupidly ambiguous tag that can apply to any character who's under eighteen, be they an infant or seventeen years and three-hundred sixty-four days. We do not have a good tag for characters who're ambiguously close to being adults like Phoebe here. The closest we get is "adolescent", which nobody uses, but means 13-17 (which is why nobody uses it because holy hell those are vastly different in a porn context). This vastly over-broad umbrella tag seems to have replaced "cub", which meant characters who're visibly underage (unlike Phoebe here) and wouldn't show up on something like this most of the time.

That's a moot point anyway, though - her ref sheet over on post #4982764 shows that she is canonically nineteen years old, which means that going by the text of the definition of the "young" tag, she does not qualify for it... except that the wording of the definition allows for arbitrary decisions that a character "looks" like she could be slightly under eighteen and this site goes by "tag what you see" rules, so her canon age doesn't matter to the rules anyway.

while the 13-17 thing is a valid point, tho hard to implement, the other stuff has a simple answer: "lore" doesnt matter to most people and if someone comes here to jack off to adults they most likely wont wanna see a character whos definitely a teenager and may or may not be a year younger or older. like, im just overexplaining TWYS here, but its basically just "outside context doesnt matter" (which makes sense in most cases imo) and "better safe than sorry" (when it comes to the 'young'-related tags)

(on a side note, the adult-or-not-thing also works the other way around. people who come here to look at teens probably dont wanna miss out on 30+% of posts just because they happen to canonically be a year older than they look either)

someduderandy said:
Sweetie, jail isn't co-ed...

Something tells me she'd be popular among inmates either way...

NO HORNY JAIL!

bread69 said:
while the 13-17 thing is a valid point, tho hard to implement, the other stuff has a simple answer: "lore" doesnt matter to most people and if someone comes here to jack off to adults they most likely wont wanna see a character whos definitely a teenager and may or may not be a year younger or older. like, im just overexplaining TWYS here, but its basically just "outside context doesnt matter" (which makes sense in most cases imo) and "better safe than sorry" (when it comes to the 'young'-related tags)

(on a side note, the adult-or-not-thing also works the other way around. people who come here to look at teens probably dont wanna miss out on 30+% of posts just because they happen to canonically be a year older than they look either)

Also, legality is usually based on whether someone "looks" adult, leading to really stupid situations where a petite 26 y/o can get charged for child pornography distribution by taking naked selfies.