This is one of the situations that can't really be properly tagged. Since no point of view character is shown, no vore tags apply, nor first_person_view (which also requires a character shown).

scth said:
This is one of the situations that can't really be properly tagged. Since no point of view character is shown, no vore tags apply, nor first_person_view (which also requires a character shown).

If only there was an "implied_unbirth" tag.

scth said:
This is one of the situations that can't really be properly tagged. Since no point of view character is shown, no vore tags apply, nor first_person_view (which also requires a character shown).

I wasn't aware character needs to be shown to qualify for first_person_view tag. I understand the "tag what you see" approach but this was 100% intended to be POV UB piece. Prooobably could find some time to add viewer's hands in a few panels so it can have the UB tag? Would that help?

cravenexx said:
I wasn't aware character needs to be shown to qualify for first_person_view tag. I understand the "tag what you see" approach but this was 100% intended to be POV UB piece. Prooobably could find some time to add viewer's hands in a few panels so it can have the UB tag? Would that help?

That would definitely do it, though it would probably count as a second version rather than just a replacement. This is one of the cases where TWYS struggles.

That said, while this use does go against the first_person_view wiki, it's used commonly enough in this way that I'm not removing the tag.

The vore tags are trickier. While the intent is clear, dialogue isn't relevant, and nothing else here really shows vore (the viewer isn't considered a character).

Edit: by not showing vore, I mean the actual act of vore, rather than the theme. An internal shot like panel 5 certainly fits the theme, just without showing a character it doesn't count for the act. Unfortunately, themes aren't tagged.

scth said:
That would definitely do it, though it would probably count as a second version rather than just a replacement. This is one of the cases where TWYS struggles.

That said, while this use does go against the first_person_view wiki, it's used commonly enough in this way that I'm not removing the tag.

The vore tags are trickier. While the intent is clear, dialogue isn't relevant, and nothing else here really shows vore (the viewer isn't considered a character).

Edit: by not showing vore, I mean the actual act of vore, rather than the theme. An internal shot like panel 5 certainly fits the theme, just without showing a character it doesn't count for the act. Unfortunately, themes aren't tagged.

Makes sense, thank you. I suppose next time i could try to include at least one panel showing the character. Still, i find it that people often enjoy to imagine themselves in the position, as their sona or real self. Showing a character kind of breaks that immersion.

And well... Up until recently i wasn't even aware my art was reposted here. I only post to Furaffinity, Eka's and my Discord server myself. I like the little extra exposure but i'm not sure it would be worth it to go out of my way and modify my art just for this site.

With the discussion above in mind, I'd honestly think it'd be better to follow the spirit of the rules rather than the letter... but I'm no staff (I'm really more of a mace) so what the hell do I know? X)