Taking pictures at a strip club, hot in art. Bad idea irl, unless if you want to be paralyzed from the neck down. It's super against the rules.

underskor said:
Taking pictures at a strip club, hot in art. Bad idea irl, unless if you want to be paralyzed from the neck down. It's super against the rules.

But it isn't in Furry World. Because everything regarding sex is allowed, and you're not allowed to ask questions.

Ai bad

nax14 said:
Ai bad

Especially Skynet, Hal 2000, V.I.K.I., and a few dozen others I can't remember ATM.

panicfox said:
Nice hyperbole. Try taking any modern sexuality to puritanical societies from 1700-1800 and you'd be put to death for cunnilingus. Alan Turing was chemically castrated in WW2 england for having gay sex.

There is a very clear delineation between fantasy and reality. In "Furry World" (I assume you mean furry sexual fetishes?) nothing is real. It is all fantasy. Furries don't exist.

I don't know what stoked the fires of the current furry sexual purity crusade but it's old, lame, and generally incorrect. Most people are on the same side but internet rhetoric is designed to other and tear apart. Just because you may feel convicted that are correct doesn't mean that you are.

"Jessie WTF are you talking about?"

panicfox said:
Nice hyperbole. Try taking any modern sexuality to puritanical societies from 1700-1800 and you'd be put to death for cunnilingus. Alan Turing was chemically castrated in WW2 england for having gay sex.

There is a very clear delineation between fantasy and reality. In "Furry World" (I assume you mean furry sexual fetishes?) nothing is real. It is all fantasy. Furries don't exist.

I don't know what stoked the fires of the current furry sexual purity crusade but it's old, lame, and generally incorrect. Most people are on the same side but internet rhetoric is designed to other and tear apart. Just because you may feel convicted that are correct doesn't mean that you are.

Schizomaxxing

nax14 said:
Ai bad

It looks like the same art style that the artist use in every artwork in their gallery.

Or they use the Ai to draw the background or something?

jerichoyeet said:
It looks like the same art style that the artist use in every artwork in their gallery.

Or they use the Ai to draw the background or something?

This particular image is entirely generated, probably using a sketch. The quality could be better, at least the eyes and face could be hand drawn.

underskor said:
Taking pictures at a strip club, hot in art. Bad idea irl, unless if you want to be paralyzed from the neck down. It's super against the rules.

Not nowadays. Every stripper has an Instagram and only fans and wants attention.

hunter42069 said:
Not nowadays. Every stripper has an Instagram and only fans and wants attention.

Isn’t that another reason not to want people taking pics? If you’re selling nudes then someone taking em for free is like piracy :p

insulindianphasmid said:
Isn’t that another reason not to want people taking pics? If you’re selling nudes then someone taking em for free is like piracy :p

^false equivalence fallacy

annonomouse said:
^false equivalence fallacy

How so? It’s the same reason why you’re not allowed to record the movies at the theater

jerichoyeet said:
It looks like the same art style that the artist use in every artwork in their gallery.

Yeah, the AI art style. Honestly, how can anyone enjoy this kind of AI slop?

ai generated backgrounds are fine tbh

fezzyrit said:
ai generated backgrounds are fine tbh

Yeah, not so much when it's everything else in the image as well. Staff seems willing to turn a blind eye to it from this and other 'artists' though :/

Shame too, since Twinkle was pretty fuckin good at what they did. Now we just get this mess.