This series is always just a panel or two away from D'awwwww

it is cute, but the damn watermark seriously ruins it every time. :\

elad said:
it is cute, but the damn watermark seriously ruins it every time. :\

Seriously. Makes you wonder why an artist would bother to put out stuff like this, only to desecrate it with a large, ugly watermark. It's like a big, indiscriminate "fuck you" in the face of the viewer.

Who the fuck steals art anymore?

Leo_Kinoske said:
Who the fuck steals art anymore?

Losers. Also, people who make huge obstructive watermarks to prove ownership are also losers.

What a great picture! Too bad the fox+fish watermark ruins it :(

I never ever notice the watermarks until you guys point them out.

ILoveCawk said:
I never ever notice the watermarks until you guys point them out.

You didn't notice the three lines of bold text that was very slightly faded out?

You need glasses.

You're not likely to see huge tubecock herms screwing 20-tailed foxes on t-shirts and mugs, but this sort of warm fuzzy art is exactly the kind of thing that gets ripped off and printed on everything. So in her defense, putting her copyright on her artwork is quite understandable.

Dio_Brando said:
You didn't notice the three lines of bold text that was very slightly faded out?

You need glasses.

No, it just means that most NORMAL people don't focus on the text. Just like your brain fills in the 'missing' bits in the blind spot of your eye, your brain can ignore superfluous garbage (like the low opacity watermark) when taking in an image you are looking at. If you weren't so busy actively looking for the watermark you might actually
enjoy the image.