Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #13465 is pending approval.
remove implication sheath (114753) -> animal_genitalia (593553)
Reason: Hopefully I did this in the right direction.
There are examples that have as much to do with real animal anatomy as fantasy dragon penises with knots:
post #6116955post #6065473post #4839488post #2176845
Some dildos also have a sculpted sheath:
post #5754213post #5724427
regsmutt said:
There are examples that have as much to do with real animal anatomy as fantasy dragon penises with knots:
post #6116955post #6065473post #4839488post #2176845
I don't think animal_genitalia excludes instances of hybrid_penis.
If people want real animal anatomy, they would need to include anatomically_correct_genitalia into their searches.
Some dildos also have a sculpted sheath:
post #5754213post #5724427
I don't think we would tag balls on dildos or strapons too, do we? Because we'd have to unimply genitals as well if that is the case.
These posts would better be served by alternative non-genitalia tags, such as dildo_with_sheath or strapon_with_balls.
thegreatwolfgang said:
If people want real animal anatomy, they would need to include anatomically_correct_genitalia into their searches.
That's only valid when it's on a matching real life species. A dragon should never be tagged anatomically_correct_genitalia (or anatomically_correct more broadly) even if they have an accurate canine_penis, for example. Similarly, a wolf with a realistic equine_penis should not be tagged with anatomically_correct_genitalia.
thegreatwolfgang said:
I don't think animal_genitalia excludes instances of hybrid_penis.If people want real animal anatomy, they would need to include anatomically_correct_genitalia into their searches.
As said, that's really not how what that tag is for or how it's used. There isn't, as far as I know, a tag for searching for or filtering out animal-like/animal-based fantasy genitalia beyond unusual_penis.
I don't think we would tag balls on dildos or strapons too, do we? Because we'd have to unimply genitals as well if that is the case.
These posts would better be served by alternative non-genitalia tags, such as dildo_with_sheath or strapon_with_balls.
Ngl I don't love when there's a tag like 'dildo_with_balls' where the intuitive implication should absolutely not be tagged.
thegreatwolfgang said:
I do not see how that argument can be applied in the same fashion as knot.
Sheath is strictly genitalia only and does not include any sex toys.
That's because I'm not talking about what's written on the wiki, but about what could be written on the wiki. The penetrable_sheath_sexy_toy doesn't exist... yet!
