Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #71393 cock_tranformation -> body_horror has been rejected.
Reason: Reason: Is it necessary to establish this Implication?After all, the tags in the blacklist support subtraction.For example:body_horror-cock_transformation
EDIT: The tag implication cock_tranformation -> body_horror (forum #483096) has been rejected by @furrypickle.
Updated by furrypickle
You forgot s in "cock_transformation"
Also do not hide a forum post with a pending implication request.
https://e621.net/tag_implications/71392
Please "reject" this implication if you want to hide it.
This would be bad idea even without the incorrectly filed implication. Cock transformation is not inherently body horror. Body horror is a horror genre, and it requires at least some amount of intentionality from the artist. Majority of cock transformation has absolutely no horror elements, and you personally finding the scenario uncomfortable to look at does not make it horror.
Please don't hide tag alias/implication/BUR suggestions. It doesn't cancel the request, but it does make it harder for everyone to find it or see the reasons that were discussed. So that is why I have unhidden it.
I also have rejected the suggestion in the system. In the future, it's good to know that you can reject your own suggestions by using the "implication #71393" link in your own suggestion, which takes you to where you can hit the 'reject' button. That way you can cancel it yourself, if you realised that it would not work very well as a suggestion anymore.
furrypickle said:
Please don't hide tag alias/implication/BUR suggestions. It doesn't cancel the request, but it does make it harder for everyone to find it or see the reasons that were discussed. So that is why I have unhidden it.I also have rejected the suggestion in the system. In the future, it's good to know that you can reject your own suggestions by using the "implication #71393" link in your own suggestion, which takes you to where you can hit the 'reject' button. That way you can cancel it yourself, if you realised that it would not work very well as a suggestion anymore.
I didn't know this thread was hidden too.
implication #71392 is still pending and hidden.
usetheblacklist said:
I didn't know this thread was hidden too.
implication #71392 is still pending and hidden.
Good catch! I hadn't seen that one was also hidden. Fixed now in both ways.
