Topic: [APPROVED] Tag implication: 1729 -> 18th_century

The tag implication #71204 1729 -> 18th_century has been approved.

Reason: Just found this randomly that it is not aliased.

EDIT: The tag implication 1729 -> 18th_century (forum #481710) has been approved by @furrypickle.

The bulk update request #13350 is active.

change category 1729 (8) -> meta
create implication 1725 (1) -> 18th_century (157)
create implication 1730 (2) -> 18th_century (157)
create implication 1800 (0) -> 18th_century (157)
remove implication 1800 (0) -> 19th_century (766)

Reason: We also need to put 1729 in the Meta category.

Also, when checking the 1700s, I discovered that a couple didn't have an implication to 18th century and that 1800 implied the wrong century (19th century).

EDIT: The bulk update request #13350 (forum #481747) has been approved by @furrypickle.

To be fair, I still think it's weird that the official changeover year between centuries happens on the --01 and not the --00 year. So that is an easy one to trip over. It's just not the most intuitive rule at all. So good catch on that!

The tag implication 1729 -> 18th_century (forum #481710) has been approved by @furrypickle.

The bulk update request #13350 (forum #481747) has been approved by @furrypickle.