Topic: Tag alias: snout_to_snout -> nose_to_nose

The tag alias #81855 snout_to_snout -> nose_to_nose is pending approval.

Reason: Same thing.

Wouldn't stuff like this count as snout_to_snout, while not being nose_to_nose?
post #1017800

watsit said:
Wouldn't stuff like this count as snout_to_snout, while not being nose_to_nose?
post #1017800

such specificity probably amounts to splitting hairs here frankly and isnt actually useful.

Also snouts_touching is already aliased to nose_to_nose.

The bulk update request #13324 is pending approval.

create alias beak_to_beak (1) -> nose_to_nose (1691)
create alias beaks_touching (2) -> nose_to_nose (1691)

Reason: same thing/action

ryu_deacon said:
The bulk update request #13324 is pending approval.

create alias beak_to_beak (1) -> nose_to_nose (1691)
create alias beaks_touching (2) -> nose_to_nose (1691)

Reason: same thing/action

breaks are mostly mouth, not nose beak, also break touching is too vague to even assume it's beak to beak that's touching

whatismyname1234 said:
breaks are mostly mouth, not nose beak, also break touching is too vague to even assume it's beak to beak that's touching

you might want to actually look at the images tagged under these, all of these x_to_x do have the same act in common that specifically excludes contact of the mouth openings.

Contact of the mouth opening would fall under kissing, should all of these be aliased to kissing?

Is it actually useful to keep single digit version tags for beaks, snouts, and noses tags separate when they all represent the same exact act?

Also a reminder again that snouts_touching is already aliases away the nose_to_nose.