Topic: logo on something -> logo

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Qwasqwasq

Member

The bulk update request #12828 is pending approval.

create implication logo_on_diaper (3) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_underwear (6) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_body (12) -> logo (31672)
create implication logo_on_topwear (76) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_clothing (322) -> logo (31672)
create implication logo_on_shirt (157) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_wall (2) -> logo (31672)
create implication logo_on_hoodie (13) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_balloon (4) -> logo (31672)
create implication logo_on_hat (29) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_sportswear (10) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_armband (1) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_swimwear (2) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_shoes (1) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_fur (1) -> logo (31672)
create implication logo_on_footwear (1) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_headwear (1) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_helmet (1) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication logo_on_mask (1) -> logo_on_clothing (322)
create implication software_logo (9) -> logo (31672)

Reason: logo on something -> logo

CoffeeCo

Privileged

Nice job!

And I forgot to say this earlier but
If logo_on_x is some kind of clothing, it should imply logo_on_clothing instead of implying logo directly.

You can edit your BUR if you click BUR #12828

CoffeeCo

Privileged

Huh so I didn't know this but apparently diaper doesn't imply clothing.

Also I'm not very sure if we want all of these rather specific tags.
Except for topwears (shirt, hoodie included,) hat and sportwear they have less than 10 posts.

Linkyu

Member

Oh perfect, I've been thinking about creating a BUR for this as well.

Just a note though, wouldn't it make more sense if the individual pieces of clothing implied the sub-category of clothing instead of clothing directly?

For example, logo_on_shirt -> logo_on_topwear, since that last one would already imply logo_on_clothing

whatismyname1234

Member

linkyu said:
Oh perfect, I've been thinking about creating a BUR for this as well.

Just a note though, wouldn't it make more sense if the individual pieces of clothing implied the sub-category of clothing instead of clothing directly?

For example, logo_on_shirt -> logo_on_topwear, since that last one would already imply logo_on_clothing

I agree, it makes more sense to me