Topic: Threat implications

The bulk update request #12827 is pending approval.

create alias threatened (29) -> threatening (3147)
create implication threatening_castration (58) -> threatening (3147)
create implication threatening_rape (42) -> threatening (3147)
create implication threatening_violence (319) -> threatening (3147)
create implication threatening_vore (251) -> threatening (3147)
create implication threatening_with_weapon (519) -> threatening (3147)
create implication threatening_viewer (200) -> threatening (3147)
create implication death_threat (249) -> threatening (3147)
create implication threatening_words (92) -> threatening (3147)
create implication threatening_suicide (6) -> threatening (3147)
create implication threatening_to_top (4) -> threatening (3147)

Reason: Actually, there's no implications of threatening tag.

threatening_to_top looks messy. Aside from preferring to avoid "top" and "bottom" for penetrative sex, the four results seem to have different meanings, from threatening anal sex (only really implying anal is the threat, saying nothing about any other orifice), or "threatening oral":[posts/5496685] (something about a "resized jaw", from what? shoving his foot in?), or a general threat for "being on the receiving end" (for what, a beating? BDSM?).

threatening_words also sounds rather banal, as most threats will include words.

I also think there should be a distinction between threatening doing something to another character (e.g. one character threatening to beat up another), separate from threatening to do some act in general (e.g. threatening to do some self-harm). And there should be some distinction for severity, violence, or harm, as someone saying "Give me that, or I'm leaving." is also a threat.