Topic: [FAILED] Ogerpon implications

The bulk update request #5701 has been rejected.

create implication ogerpon (391) -> pokemon_(species) (618981)
create implication ogerpon (391) -> legendary_pokemon (68421)
create implication ogerpon (391) -> generation_9_pokemon (24844)
create implication teal_mask_ogerpon (324) -> ogerpon (391)

Reason: Multiple implications for Ogerpon, first time using this method so hope the formatting is correct.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5701 (forum #379634) has failed: Error: ogerpon already implies pokemon_(species) through another implication (create implication ogerpon -> pokemon_(species))

EDIT: The bulk update request #5701 (forum #379634) has been rejected by @slyroon.

I was about to create a BUR for Ogerpon's forms (cornerstone_mask_ogerpon, hearthflame_mask_ogerpon, wellspring_mask_ogerpon, and as already mentioned above, teal_mask_ogerpon), but given how e.g. mega evolutions for 'mons don't imply their non-mega forms, I'm not so sure.

The first three implications make sense, though.

The bulk update request #5701 (forum #379634) has failed: Error: ogerpon already implies pokemon_(species) through another implication (create implication ogerpon -> pokemon_(species))

The bulk update request #5701 (forum #379634) has been rejected by @slyroon.