Topic: [APPROVED] Imminent oral implications

The bulk update request #5693 is active.

create implication imminent_cunnilingus (197) -> imminent_oral (3467)
create implication imminent_fellatio (694) -> imminent_oral (3467)
create implication imminent_rimming (467) -> imminent_oral (3467)

Reason: All of the non-imminent versions of these tags implicate oral, so the imminent versions should implicate imminent_oral as well.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5693 (forum #379408) has been approved by @slyroon.

How do you tell the difference between imminent_fellatio and imminent_irrumatio? The difference between fellatio and irrumatio is who the "active" participant is (a character thrusting into their partner's stationary mouth is irrumatio, a character that moves their head/tongue to pleasure their partner's penis is fellatio), but if it's not happening yet, there is no action yet to say who the active participant is going to be. They should probably be aliased together, as I imagine people will use imminent_irrumatio largely based on say-so rather than any visual difference from imminent_fellatio.

I also find beakjob rather silly, as it's just fellatio by a (usually avian) character that happens to have a beak instead of a snout or muzzle. And we don't tag snoutjob or muzzlejob which would be the equivalent for a (usually non-avian) character. So, imminent_beakjob seems equally silly to me.

watsit said:
How do you tell the difference between imminent_fellatio and imminent_irrumatio

I was actually debating on whether to add it because of this, however if the to-be penetrated's head is bound with the penetrator's penis about to enter, we can assume that it will be irrumatio.

Or in cases like: https://e621.net/posts/17566. Which we know isn't about to be fellatio based on the body language of the two participants, the gag, and the hand position on the head.

As for the beakjob, it exists as a tag already, so I saw no reason to not use it here to keep the same structure. However, I do agree that beakjob makes no sense as a tag, but I didn't make this implication under what I personally believe made sense, I did it off of what we already have as tags.

watsit said:
I also find beakjob rather silly, as it's just fellatio by a (usually avian) character that happens to have a beak instead of a snout or muzzle. And we don't tag snoutjob or muzzlejob which would be the equivalent for a (usually non-avian) character. So, imminent_beakjob seems equally silly to me.

beakjob is a much broader tag than fellatio though, since it applies to all situations where a character uses their beak to stimulate their partner. Whereas fellatio is limited to just mouth/tongue on penis.

The bulk update request #5693 (forum #379408) has been approved by @slyroon.