Topic: [FAILED] Undo bur #57 (egg_in_*/egg_from_*)

The bulk update request #2190 has been rejected.

remove implication egg_in_ass (1329) -> egg_insertion (4502)
remove implication egg_in_mouth (307) -> egg_insertion (4502)
remove implication egg_in_pussy (0) -> egg_insertion (4502)
remove implication egg_in_slit (18) -> egg_insertion (4502)
remove implication egg_in_cloaca (0) -> egg_insertion (4502)
remove implication egg_in_urethra (175) -> egg_insertion (4502)
remove implication egg_in_nipples (48) -> egg_insertion (4502)
remove implication egg_from_ass (990) -> oviposition (14124)
remove implication egg_from_mouth (77) -> oviposition (14124)
remove implication egg_from_pussy (0) -> oviposition (14124)
remove implication egg_from_cloaca (169) -> oviposition (14124)
remove implication egg_from_urethra (170) -> oviposition (14124)
remove implication egg_from_ovipositor (313) -> oviposition (14124)
remove implication egg_from_nipples (45) -> oviposition (14124)

Reason: Disclaimer: BUR #57 was also filed by me.

egg_in_* (mirroring cum_from_*) is way too aggressive an implication considering the pattern mirrors cum_from_* which doesn't have that sort of meaning. *_egg_insertion is a better fit for that implication.

egg_from_* turns out to have issues with regards to the implied tags not correctly representing what's on the image, with the most glaring of these is egg_from_mouth implying oviposition (even though most of these are actually egg_through). Likewise, eggs that were previously manually inserted incorrectly count as oviposition when coming out.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2190 (forum #330029) has failed: Implication for egg_in_ass not found

EDIT: The bulk update request #2190 (forum #330029) has been rejected by @spe.

Should be standardised, no? Like with cum_in_* and cum_from_*, the former is meant to convey "going in/inside" while the latter is meant to convey "coming out/leaking".

thegreatwolfgang said:
Should be standardised, no? Like with cum_in_* and cum_from_*, the former is meant to convey "going in/inside" while the latter is meant to convey "coming out/leaking".

cum_in_* isn't even mutually exclusive to cum_from_* (you oftentimes see both used together) and even if they were, cum_from_* doesn't imply emitting_cum because there are other ways to get cum coming out of someone's, say, mouth, and I would argue that, for the same reason, there's a leap in logic between egg_from_* and oviposition.

I should also mention how, at the time of topic #23840, it was unclear what would work best to represent direction, since the naming conventions were all over the place. We now have very clear and well established for ADJECTIVAL_oviposition AND ADJECTIVAL_egg_insertion. The mistake I made with bur 57 was assuming that an egg coming out of any hole could be counted as oviposition, but that's skipping a step between "an egg is coming out" and "the egg is being laid", which causes a number of issues with tags like egg_play and egg_through. Removing these implications creating new ones for the oviposition and egg_insertion patterns seems like a far better way to organize the tags to be, while avoiding surprise implications that might turn out to be incorrect.

EDIT: "egg_in_mouth" is also kind of being split between swallowing_eggs and oral_egg_insertion, to make the intent clearer.

The bulk update request #2190 (forum #330029) has been rejected by @spe.