Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #38388 alna_fratcher -> alna has been rejected.
Reason: Same Artist; The art is split between the two tags and should be together.
EDIT: The tag implication alna_fratcher -> alna (forum #306806) has been rejected by @Millcore.
Updated by auto moderator
Should also be reversed, I think. Alna is a fairly simple name that I could see clashing with other artists and/or characters, and alna_fratcher is a bit more precise that's less prone to coming up for someone else.
watsit said:
Should also be reversed, I think. Alna is a fairly simple name that I could see clashing with other artists and/or characters, and alna_fratcher is a bit more precise that's less prone to coming up for someone else.
yeah I think that would be better. I'm still trying to get the hang of Alias and Implications...
kemonophonic said:
Shouldn't this be an alias, not an implication?
maybe? I am unsure...I do know these two tags are the same and need to be put under one tag though.
closetpossum said:
maybe? I am unsure...I do know these two tags are the same and need to be put under one tag though.
It seems like you needed an alias instead of an implication.
An alias is used when you want one tag to completely replace another.
An implication is used when you want one tag to have another tag automatically added to posts as well.
Hopefully this input has been helpful.
d.d.m. said:
It seems like you needed an alias instead of an implication.An alias is used when you want one tag to completely replace another.
- Use alias tag_1 -> tag_2 if you want tag_1 to be replaced by tag_2.
- An alias is used if tag_1 and tag_2 are used for the same object, character, artist, etc.
- Examples: alias mammals -> mammal, alias twilight_sparkle -> twilight_sparkle_(mlp), and alias pocket_monsters -> pokémon
An implication is used when you want one tag to have another tag automatically added to posts as well.
- Use implication tag_1 -> tag_2 if you want tag_1 to have tag_2 automatically added onto any posts that are tagged with tag_1.
- An implication is only used if tag_2 is guaranteed to apply to any post that has tag_1 as well.
- Examples: implication long_hair -> hair, implication fox -> canine, and implication judy_hopps -> zootopia
Hopefully this input has been helpful.
That does help, aw man, and BitWolfy JUST explained this to me yesterday *smacks forehead* how the heck did I still get this mixed up!?
Thanks a lot D.D.M
Can someone Deny this now, I know what to do now...
The tag implication alna_fratcher -> alna (forum #306806) has been rejected by @Millcore.
