Topic: Bondage BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Leotheairwolf

Member

The bulk update request #736 is pending approval.

create implication tongue_bondage (87) -> bondage (137955)
create implication tongue_bondage (87) -> bound (202249)
create implication tongue_bondage (87) -> tongue (1047043)
create implication hair_bondage (66) -> bondage (137955)
create implication hair_bondage (66) -> bound (202249)
create implication hair_bondage (66) -> hair (2176998)
create implication wings_tied (1834) -> bound (202249)
create implication self-bondage (293) -> bondage (137955)
create alias toe_bondage (71) -> toes_tied (1244)

Reason: List of bondage tags that should probably imply bondage and being bound.

The only one here I'm not sure of is wing_bondage and wings_tied Other body parts use the <body part>_tied format. Please feel free to discuss your thoughts on that.

Bregggo

Member

leotheairwolf said:
The bulk update request #736 is pending approval.

create implication tongue_bondage (87) -> bondage (137955)
create implication tongue_bondage (87) -> bound (202249)
create implication tongue_bondage (87) -> tongue (1047043)
create implication hair_bondage (66) -> bondage (137955)
create implication hair_bondage (66) -> bound (202249)
create implication hair_bondage (66) -> hair (2176998)
create implication wings_tied (1834) -> bound (202249)
create implication self-bondage (293) -> bondage (137955)
create alias toe_bondage (71) -> toes_tied (1244)

Reason: List of bondage tags that should probably imply bondage and being bound.

The only one here I'm not sure of is wing_bondage and wings_tied Other body parts use the <body part>_tied format. Please feel free to discuss your thoughts on that.

I believe the implications should be Tied (a specific way of being bound) -> Bound -> Bondage (can refer to the state of being bound, as well as the acts of bindng and unbinding, neither of which would should be considered being "bound").
I'd otherwise agree.