Topic: [APPROVED] BUR only ('*_only' tag stuff)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Monsterbomb10010

Member

The bulk update request #116 is active.

remove implication hat_only (13604) -> mostly_nude (152759)
remove implication hat_only (13604) -> headwear (285995)
create implication hat_only (13604) -> hat (261608)
create implication hat_only (13604) -> headwear_only (15404)
create implication headwear_only (15404) -> headwear (285995)
create implication headwear_only (15404) -> mostly_nude (152759)
create implication headwear_only (15404) -> headgear_only (18189)
create implication headgear_only (18189) -> headgear (369352)
create implication helmet_only (1556) -> helmet (36913)
create implication helmet_only (1556) -> headgear_only (18189)
create implication mask_only (1470) -> mask (65069)
create implication mask_only (1470) -> nude (1512520)
create implication sunglasses_only (1527) -> sunglasses (42151)
create implication sunglasses_only (1527) -> eyewear_only (14085)
create implication glasses_only (11106) -> glasses (273563)
create implication eyewear_only (14085) -> nude (1512520)
create implication boots_only (2403) -> boots (97740)
create implication boots_only (2403) -> footwear_only (12153)
create implication sandals_only (346) -> sandals (18041)
create implication sandals_only (346) -> footwear_only (12153)
create implication socks_only (2921) -> socks (79854)
create implication socks_only (2921) -> mostly_nude (152759)
create implication underwear_only (30652) -> underwear (441998)
create implication underwear_only (30652) -> clothed (1420727)
create implication panties_only (4135) -> underwear_only (30652)
create implication panties_only (4135) -> topless (160635)
create implication bra_only (619) -> bra (85643)
create implication bra_only (619) -> underwear_only (30652)
create implication bra_only (619) -> bottomless (191710)
create implication topwear_only (16600) -> topwear (705364)
create implication topwear_only (16600) -> bottomless (191710)
create implication coat_only (300) -> coat (27493)
create implication coat_only (300) -> topwear_only (16600)
create implication shirt_only (6603) -> shirt (418916)
create implication shirt_only (6603) -> topwear_only (16600)
create implication hoodie_only (3411) -> hoodie (65232)
create implication hoodie_only (3411) -> topwear_only (16600)
create implication robe_only (1096) -> robe (24555)
create implication robe_only (1096) -> mostly_nude (152759)
create implication scarf_only (3682) -> mostly_nude (152759)
create implication gloves_only (4606) -> gloves (246825)
create implication gloves_only (4606) -> handwear_only (4950)
create implication handwear_only (4950) -> handwear (259420)
create implication handwear_only (4950) -> mostly_nude (152759)

Reason: When a user gives some *_only tags attention, and nothing else...

Also see implication #29810 (panties_only -> panties)

EDIT: The bulk update request #116 (forum #293104) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

Watsit

Privileged

Shouldn't those aliases be implications? Also hat_only -> hat and helmet_only -> helmet implications would make sense too.

user 187249

Member

+1, and nothing else...

Actually, there is something else. I noticed a few implications missing from the list.

Extra Implications

create implication glasses_only -> glasses
create implication handwear_only -> handwear
create implication panties_only -> panties

I'm also unsure about the eyewear_only/mask_only -> nude implications. I guess it depends whether or not a 'non-clothing_only' tag (collar_only, eyewear_only) and a 'clothing_only' tag (headwear_only, footwear_only) can be used on the same post.

Genjar

Former Staff

strikerman said:
Not mostly nude?

Wondered about that myself. Accessories don't count as clothing, so if masks are accessories then it's nude. But perhaps those should be considered clothing.