Implicating breast_grab → hand_on_breast
Link to implication
Reason:
Similar to how butt_grab implies hand_on_butt, it would make sense to parallel this to breasts, since the former can't be done without the latter.
Updated by ZaSigma4
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating breast_grab → hand_on_breast
Link to implication
Similar to how butt_grab implies hand_on_butt, it would make sense to parallel this to breasts, since the former can't be done without the latter.
Updated by ZaSigma4
+1
Updated by anonymous
Approved
Updated by anonymous
There are some tentacle-based breast grabs, though. As in 300 posts that ought to be revised now.
Updated by anonymous
Although wondering if definition at breast_grab and/or hand on breast should be updated now.
Currently breast_grab is "When a character is grabbing, fondling, squeezing or groping a pair of breasts"
{so doing something with ANY breast(s)}
but hand on breast is "This tag is used when a character has their hand resting on or covering their breast/breasts."
{so doing something with their OWN breast(s)}
Updated by anonymous
I thought breast_grab was something done to another character, holding_breast was something done to oneself, and hand_on_breast was independent but overlapping both cases.
The whole thing's kind of a mess, honestly. People use breast_grab and holding_breast interchangeably. And I have no idea what's up with grope and fondling.
Updated by anonymous
attempt to clarify my previous post:
ie. image of someone touching SOMEONE ELSE's breast gets tagged with breast_grab and thus (with the implication) is tagged with hand_on_breast {which is currently defined as someone touching their OWN breast}
Updated by anonymous
EarthFurst2 said:
attempt to clarify my previous post:
ie. image of someone touching SOMEONE ELSE's breast gets tagged with breast_grab and thus (with the implication) is tagged with hand_on_breast {which is currently defined as someone touching their OWN breast}
A character holding their own should be under holding_breast (akin to holding_butt).
I went ahead and changed the wiki over for clarity.
Updated by anonymous
Hmm, now the definitions for BOTH breast_grab and hand_on_breast are hand-on-ANYONE's-breast type.
Agree with parasprite that holding_breast should be holding your own breast.
how about:
Updated by anonymous
+1, and note that holding_breast/breast_grab does not always mean hand_on_breast (e.g. post #596137 and post #533335).
Updated by anonymous
Same is true for breast_fondling.
Perhaps those shouldn't have been implicated. Unless tentacles should count as 'hands'..?
Updated by anonymous
Genjar said:
Same is true for breast_fondling.
Perhaps those shouldn't have been implicated. Unless tentacles should count as 'hands'..?
I think it would be better to go without the word "hand" tbh.
Also, holding_own_breast (or similar) might work to split the self/other meaning. The ones we have now aren't terribly obvious as to which one is which.
Updated by anonymous
Updated by anonymous