Topic: Tag Alias: 69 -> 69_position

Aliasing 69 → 69_position
Link to alias

Reason:

69 is one of the few sex position tags that do not have the *_position suffix. And I noticed that some users have tagged 69_position. Probably for the aforementioned reason.

So at the very least, those should be aliased. I don't think it matters much which one ends up as the main tag. If you feel that the shorter tag is better, this could be flipped around..

Nah, looks good to me. Approved and I'll move the implications/wikis now

Edit: Done.

Unrelated: I just found 1691. Thoughts?

parasprite said:
Unrelated: I just found 1691. Thoughts?

Hadn't heard of that one before, but I don't intimately (ahem) follow the latest trends in sexual geometries (so to speak). If it's something real, though, other than an implication of 69_position I'd say leave it be. Wouldn't be the first tag that started out with only a handful of examples, I believe.

parasprite said:
Nah, looks good to me. Approved and I'll move the implications/wikis now

Edit: Done.

Unrelated: I just found 1691. Thoughts?

I've noticed so many examples of this. We need to start tagging that more.

parasprite said:
Nah, looks good to me. Approved and I'll move the implications/wikis now

Edit: Done.

Unrelated: I just found 1691. Thoughts?

Really? Positions are usually a LOT better defined than this. What about the same, but standing (holding partner upside down) vs. on back vs. on side? 69 is really just the abbreviation for "mutual_blowjob". We would never alias mutual_masturbation to any *_position tag, now, would we?

Circeus said:
Really? Positions are usually a LOT better defined than this. What about the same, but standing (holding partner upside down) vs. on back vs. on side? 69 is really just the abbreviation for "mutual_blowjob". We would never alias mutual_masturbation to any *_position tag, now, would we?

At one point I tried to get a distinction drawn between the 69 position and mutual oral, but the response was altogether underwhelming.

Clawdragons said:
At one point I tried to get a distinction drawn between the 69 position and mutual oral, but the response was altogether underwhelming.

My main concern is that we don't typically combine 2- and 3-partner positions for group sex images, but this will cause that to happen, and suddenly a picture becomess simultaneously anvil_position and 69_position, which to me doesn't quite jive.

Not to mention that no other sex position involves oral sex only (e.g. no one would ever think of rusty trombone as a position, even though the same argument apply as for 69).

Circeus said:
(e.g. no one would ever think of rusty trombone as a position, even though the same argument apply as for 69).

I would, but I'm probably not the most apt person for this mind of subject.

Circeus said:
What about the same, but standing (holding partner upside down) vs. on back vs. on side?

Standing_69 exists, but I didn't bring it up because it's not tagged much (yet?).

Lol 69...

Will standing_69 be aliased to *_position / something else?

post #1054731 is currently tagged with stand and carry position

Personally, I wouldn't mind if both are tagged, but whatever works

titanmelon said:
Will standing_69 be aliased to *_position / something else?

post #1054731 is currently tagged with stand and carry position

Personally, I wouldn't mind if both are tagged, but whatever works

Implicate to upside-down and 69_position? I would add standing to that list but the upright character is kneeling in some of them. Perhaps vertical_69 would be a more accurate tag to use?

stand and carry position would apply to the standing ones, provided the upside-down character isn't being held up by some other means.

Isn't there an artist named 69?