Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag alias #82334 big_top_small_bottom -> small_bottom_large_top is pending approval.
Reason: (So it could be either or) Would make a lot more sense to just have these grouped together since they are literally the exact same thing.
As for which one, again, that's up for y'all But like I said, it would just make a lot more sense if both of these were grouped together.
If it's top/bottom as in penetrating/penetrated these could both be aliased to smaller_penetrated. If it's top/bottom as in dominant/submissive these could both be aliased to larger_dom.
While I do agree that aliasing the former to the latter would be a good idea without any context, having looked through both tags it appears confusing what either of them are trying to achieve. As EightOfLakes mentioned above, it could either be taken as top/bottom = penetration direction, or top/bottom = dominance or submissiveness based on visual clues in the image. For example, this post: post #4870841
is tagged with big_top_small_bottom. Given the impending penetration, this would be a valid use of the tag, however it's clear given other context within this image that the larger male is submissive to the smaller one, as they are physically restrained. I think it's ultimately a matter that would have to be settled via a decision to what top/bottom means in context on e621 to clear up potential confusion.
eightoflakes said:
If it's top/bottom as in penetrating/penetrated these could both be aliased to smaller_penetrated. If it's top/bottom as in dominant/submissive these could both be aliased to larger_dom.
Or if it's top/bottom as in physical placement, they could both be aliased to larger_on_top.
