Topic: alias gender_rimming_form

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #13681 is pending approval.

create alias male_rimming_anthro (38) -> male_rimming (1594)
create alias male_rimming_humanoid (1) -> male_rimming (1594)
create alias male_rimming_human (5) -> male_rimming (1594)
create alias male_rimming_taur (0) -> male_rimming (1594)
create alias female_rimming_anthro (7) -> female_rimming (766)
create alias female_rimming_feral (51) -> female_rimming (766)
create alias female_rimming_humanoid (0) -> female_rimming (766)
create alias female_rimming_human (0) -> female_rimming (766)
create alias female_rimming_taur (0) -> female_rimming (766)

Reason: Related topic #60466

These kinds of combo tags bloat the tag list.
And [gender]_[verb]_[form] is rather confusing. It's unclear from the tag name if you can use it when both characters are the same form or the same sex.

A similar tag [gender]_penetrating_[form]'s wiki says you can't use it on the same forms. Still, male_penetrating_feral feral_on_feral has 721 posts. That means about 13% of male_penetrating_feral is a mistag.

The former discussion (topic #60466) also mentions that while x_penetrating_y is a special case, other verb combos should be aliased away.

Missing aliases:
alias male_rimming_feral -> male_rimming (Already in BUR #7738)

Watsit

Privileged

yummytummysketties said:
The former discussion (topic #60466) also mentions that while x_penetrating_y is a special case, other verb combos should be aliased away.

A special case for keeping <form>_penetrating_<form> and <sex>_penetrating_<sex>, while the other x_<verbing>_y tags are unnecessary alongside x_<verbing> and <verbed>_y. The mixed-category <form>_penetrating_<sex> and <sex>_penetrating_<form> tags are still on the chopping block as tag bloat (see topic #42656).

watsit said:
A special case for keeping <form>_penetrating_<form> and <sex>_penetrating_<sex>, while the other x_<verbing>_y tags are unnecessary alongside x_<verbing> and <verbed>_y. The mixed-category <form>_penetrating_<sex> and <sex>_penetrating_<form> tags are still on the chopping block as tag bloat (see topic #42656).

I'm planning to request <gender>_penetrating_<form> aliases too but I guess it'll be blocked by Wandering Spaniel's BURs