Title
Posted under Off Topic
Title
donovan_dmc said:
https://e621.net/search_trends
https://e621.net/tags?search[order]=post_count
It's interesting how the search trends list seems to have some tags manually excluded. For instance, age_difference is at 218 and human_on_feral is at 289, yet young and bestiality don't seem to appear in the list despite how they almost certainly should be higher.
scth said:
It's interesting how the search trends list seems to have some tags manually excluded. For instance, age_difference is at 218 and human_on_feral is at 289, yet young and bestiality don't seem to appear in the list despite how they almost certainly should be higher.
there's a search trend blacklist, ig they don't want to draw attention to it. i dunno if 'young' would draw any more legal scrutiny than 'rape' or 'incest' though
oneohthrix said:
there's a search trend blacklist, ig they don't want to draw attention to it. i dunno if 'young' would draw any more legal scrutiny than 'rape' or 'incest' though
im not entirely sure, but i think the argument for fiction depictions of rape and incest would be just SLIGHTLY a bit easier to defend than fictional "depictions" of children.
if you think about it, you could probably go to your public library and find a couple of books featuring rape, incest, or both. however, sexual depictions of minors is likely going to be very less common, with the most you would get is non-sexualized child abuse.
oneohthrix said:
there's a search trend blacklist, ig they don't want to draw attention to it. i dunno if 'young' would draw any more legal scrutiny than 'rape' or 'incest' though
I'd wager that it's at least partially to not encourage people gaming the system to bump those tags up to the top as proof of the community's degeneracy or whatever.