Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: nude_anthro -> anthro

The tag implication #71903 nude_anthro -> anthro has been rejected.

Reason: implies anthro

EDIT: The tag implication nude_anthro -> anthro (forum #485192) has been rejected by @forest1985.

This has been suggested so many times that it is starting to become a problem, see topic #40839, topic #40928, topic #55329, topic #55479, & topic #62682 (your own BUR).

Also, do not submit duplicate requests like this, especially one that you have already submitted yourself.
Failing to link previous discussions on the matter makes it look like you're trying to hide any oppositions to your idea.

thegreatwolfgang said:
This has been suggested so many times that it is starting to become a problem, see topic #40839, topic #40928, topic #55329, topic #55479, & topic #62682 (your own BUR).

Also, do not submit duplicate requests like this, especially one that you have already submitted yourself.
Failing to link previous discussions on the matter makes it look like you're trying to hide any oppositions to your idea.

i'm sorry, i just don't understand why such a big tag with dual applications (nude + anthro) isn't being implicated to those two things. i didn't know requesting again wasnt allowed

forest1985 said:
i'm sorry, i just don't understand why such a big tag with dual applications (nude + anthro) isn't being implicated to those two things. i didn't know requesting again wasnt allowed

It's not so much that it isn't allowed but that the request has already been done. It's that multiple requests of the same thing can interfere with each other, if only because an Admin has to hunt down the duplicates and reject them.

In the future, you can use topic #43250 to bump AIBURs.

The tag implication nude_anthro -> anthro (forum #485192) has been rejected by @forest1985.