Topic: Tag alias: bestiality_temptation -> feral_temptation

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

usetheblacklist said:
I prefer it reversed. Feral temptation sounds a little ambiguous to me.

not all feral/non feral stuff is bestiality, they could be tempting you to kiss them. Meanwhile bestiality implies there is a feral in the situation always, so should be either aliased or implicated.

they are not the same, it's only bestiality if it is a human/humanoid/anthro x feral. a tag like feral_temptation doesn't imply that in the tag itself. taken literally, it could mean a feral is tempting another character of any form, including another feral, which would make it not bestiality.
not to mention how awkward and clunky the phrase "feral temptation" is :P that tag should be gotten rid of for that alone

forest1985 said:
not all feral/non feral stuff is bestiality, they could be tempting you to kiss them. Meanwhile bestiality implies there is a feral in the situation always, so should be either aliased or implicated.

can you show any examples of feral_temptation where the feral character is not tempting another character (or the viewer) into commiting bestiality?

Watsit

Privileged

Another issue is with mistags. feral_temptation seems to be getting tagged when bestiality is already occurring:
post #6134807 post #6034418 post #6049748 post #5295173
It's not a temptation if you've already given in. It's also used for general "sexy feral" images:
post #5814267 post #6063792 post #6162168 post #6132078
Or bestiality_humiliation:
post #6041438 post #5980530

If these count as feral_temptation or bestiality_temptation, then it's little different from a random set of feral posts.

watsit said:
...

I'll admit the tagging can be messy.

I created feral_temptation based on the pedophilia_temptation and pedophilia_humiliation tags, which were created by someone else earlier that same day. I'll admit bestiality_humiliation (and perhaps a separate bestiality_temptation tag?) might've been a better name for what I was going for. My reasoning for going with feral_temptation was... in short, based on a lot of nonsensical reasoning. Bestiality_humiliation, bestiality_temptation, incestuous_temptation_(lore), and pokephilia_humiliation were later created by other users.

My original intent for the tag was "bestiality as a taboo". Essentially, a tag for posts with text/dialogue that draws attention to "this would be/is bestiality" or at least "this (=bestiality) is kinda messed up/maybe I shouldn't...". Stuff like these:
post #4864395 post #3822980 post #1780855 post #3645298

The tag got more popular as time went on, and some users would just tag it on random ferals presenting and such
post #5814267
To be fair, with the wiki I wrote, I can see how someone could see "feral character presenting" as a valid usage, but it wasn't really my intent though.

Watsit

Privileged

crocogator said:
My original intent for the tag was "bestiality as a taboo". Essentially, a tag for posts with text/dialogue that draws attention to "this would be/is bestiality" or at least "this (=bestiality) is kinda messed up/maybe I shouldn't...". Stuff like these:

I do kinda feel this is rather subjective, as is a common issue when trying to infer things from dialog. Where is the line between "I shouldn't do this (bestiality)..." and "I shouldn't do this (sex)...", or "You want this (animal ass)?" and "you want this (my ass)?"
post #6132078 post #5441871 post #5329373

Another angle to consider this from is that while the taboo of human/feral relations is a kink for some people, one could play up human/anthro relations for similar human-and-animal taboo (and for some people neither count if the feral can talk or is sapient, or if the other character is an anthro). So restricting it to just ferals seems unnecessarily limiting, and not everyone draws the same line for a bestiality kink/taboo like this that e6 does. It feels like it's brushing awfully close to a general "feral kink" or "feral fetish" tag.