Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #71587 u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement -> u.s._department_of_homeland_security has been rejected.
Reason: ICE is a 2003 subsidiary of the DHS
EDIT: The tag implication immigration_and_customs_enforcement -> u.s._department_of_homeland_security (forum #484198) has been rejected by @furrypickle.
Updated by auto moderator
tbh, the immigration_and_customs_enforcement tag should probably be renamed to become u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement first, and then this implication would probably work fine.
Because we all know which country's immigration and customs enforcement that it's mostly going to be about. So in practice it will probably work. BUT that tag name invites the tag to be used as a broader category for any immigration enforcement regardless of nationality... so then implicating it to any specific country would cause some mess.
But if we clarify the name, give it a quick check through for any non-usa examples to move out of it just in case. After that, I think it should work.
The bulk update request #13515 is active.
create alias immigration_and_customs_enforcement (0) -> u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement (10)
create alias us_immigration_and_customs_enforcement (0) -> u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement (10)
create alias united_states_immigration_and_customs_enforcement (2) -> u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement (10)
create implication u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement (10) -> u.s._department_of_homeland_security (15)
Reason: Let's formalize this idea.
EDIT: The bulk update request #13515 (forum #484369) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias immigration_and_customs_enforcement -> u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement)
EDIT: The bulk update request #13515 (forum #484369) has been approved by @furrypickle.
Updated by auto moderator
furrypickle said:
The bulk update request #13515 is active.create alias immigration_and_customs_enforcement (0) -> u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement (10)
create alias us_immigration_and_customs_enforcement (0) -> u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement (10)
create alias united_states_immigration_and_customs_enforcement (2) -> u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement (10)
create implication u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement (10) -> u.s._department_of_homeland_security (15)Reason: Let's formalize this idea.
add united_states_immigration_and_customs_enforcement as well
whatismyname1234 said:
add united_states_immigration_and_customs_enforcement as well
Good idea! The BUR has been edited to add that now too.
furrypickle said:
tbh, the immigration_and_customs_enforcement tag should probably be renamed to become u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement first, and then this implication would probably work fine.Because we all know which country's immigration and customs enforcement that it's mostly going to be about. So in practice it will probably work. BUT that tag name invites the tag to be used as a broader category for any immigration enforcement regardless of nationality... so then implicating it to any specific country would cause some mess.
But if we clarify the name, give it a quick check through for any non-usa examples to move out of it just in case. After that, I think it should work.
From what I can Google, it seems the "Immigration_and Customs Enforcement" name is unique to the US, so aliasing it to u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement shouldn't be an issue. Even Wikipedia does it.
The bulk update request #13515 (forum #484369) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias immigration_and_customs_enforcement -> u.s._immigration_and_customs_enforcement)
The tag implication immigration_and_customs_enforcement -> u.s._department_of_homeland_security (forum #484198) has been rejected by @furrypickle.
The bulk update request #13515 (forum #484369) has been approved by @furrypickle.
