Casual exposure and casual nudity both need cleanup. They're both intended for non-sexual nudity but have plenty of sexual posts, or questionable cases. Casual exposure seems to be the worse offender between them, but I'm grouping them together here due to their close relation. Some offending posts with either tag may be better tagged with casual sex, outside sex, public exposure, public nudity, or other similar tags.
1. Should the casual exposure wiki add more clarification about when to use it or not use it? Or at least brought more in line with casual nudity? (and vice-versa if needed)
From casual nudity:
Do NOT tag if the character is blushing, looks concerned, or seems otherwise embarrassed about nudity.
Do NOT tag if the character is sexually aroused or is displaying seductive behavior.
2. These are some examples that seem to be blatantly sexual among all nude or partially-nude characters.
post #6241385
post #6062121
post #5981260 female is groping both males
post #5972716 dripping cum
post #5235655
3. Should images be tagged that depict both casual nudity and sex? (comics, groups, background characters, etc)
post #6216115
post #6174182 I can't tell if the top left female is getting fucked or not, but it's otherwise a public orgy
post #5997290
post #5254716
post #4015121
post #3819937
4. Other questionable cases.
Some apron only images are fine, but if the most we see is the side of an ass of a character facing the viewer, is that really exposure?
post #6217267
I understand lactation is questionable depending on context, but what about cases such as casual_exposure i_mean_breast_milk?
post #3308356
post #2944950