Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #13408 is pending approval.
create implication missing_arm (2757) -> missing_limb (292)
create implication missing_leg (1170) -> missing_limb (292)
create implication missing_all_arms (726) -> missing_arm (2757)
create implication missing_all_legs (482) -> missing_leg (1170)
Reason: Arms and legs are limbs.
The bulk update request #13433 is pending approval.
create implication 1_missing_limb (451) -> missing_limb (292)
create implication 2_missing_limbs (816) -> missing_limb (292)
create implication 3_missing_limbs (87) -> missing_limb (292)
create implication 4_missing_limbs (2925) -> missing_limb (292)
Reason: Followup for the above.
munchmallow-frosty said:
The bulk update request #13433 is pending approval.create implication 1_missing_limb (451) -> missing_limb (292)
create implication 2_missing_limbs (816) -> missing_limb (292)
create implication 3_missing_limbs (87) -> missing_limb (292)
create implication 4_missing_limbs (2925) -> missing_limb (292)Reason: Followup for the above.
...honestly, I'd rather exterminate the numbered tags for consistency. Given the distribution, I'd say most are really more interested in missing_all_arms/missing_all_legs (for 2_missing_limbs) & quadruple_amputee/missing_all_limbs (for 4_missing_limbs). Although there isn't currently a missing_all_limbs tag, I'd rather do something like...
alias 1_missing_limb -> missing_limb alias 2_missing_limbs -> missing_limb alias 3_missing_limbs -> missing_limb alias 4_missing_limbs -> missing_all_limbs
...maybe with an added...
imply missing_all_limbs -> missing_all_arms imply missing_all_limbs -> missing_all_legs
...but maybe there's edge cases where that isn't inherently true.
aacafah said:
...honestly, I'd rather exterminate the numbered tags for consistency. Given the distribution, I'd say most are really more interested in missing_all_arms/missing_all_legs (for 2_missing_limbs) & quadruple_amputee/missing_all_limbs (for 4_missing_limbs). Although there isn't currently a missing_all_limbs tag, I'd rather do something like...alias 1_missing_limb -> missing_limb alias 2_missing_limbs -> missing_limb alias 3_missing_limbs -> missing_limb alias 4_missing_limbs -> missing_all_limbs...maybe with an added...
imply missing_all_limbs -> missing_all_arms imply missing_all_limbs -> missing_all_legs...but maybe there's edge cases where that isn't inherently true.
I can definitely see the reasoning there. I figured we should keep them because they could serve as umbrella tags for different combinations of missing limbs, like if a character was missing an arm and a leg. Thinking about it now, characters with more than four limbs being featured in posts like this might make it an issue, since we'd have to tag them with 6_missing_limbs or 8_missing limbs, and so on. An alias might be warranted.
I came up with an argument against missing_all_limbs implying missing_all_arms and missing_all_legs. If a quadruple amputee feral is missing all its limbs, it'd only be missing legs since it had no arms to begin with, right?
munchmallow-frosty said:
I came up with an argument against missing_all_limbs implying missing_all_arms and missing_all_legs. If a quadruple amputee feral is missing all its limbs, it'd only be missing legs since it had no arms to begin with, right?
Thought forelegs are considered arms tag-wise.
yummytummysketties said:
Thought forelegs are considered arms tag-wise.
That's what I consider to be so. post #6259581 is a handjob, not a footjob/foot_fetish. post #3260937 would be spread_arms (and finger_claws), not spread_legs (and toe_claws).
Wait, really? I guess I never really knew that. Thanks! No objections then.
Is it possible to include missing_all_limbs?
imply missing_all_limbs -> missing_all_legs imply missing_all_limbs -> missing_all_arms
I said in another forum but "all" can work for characters with more than 5 limbs. (taurs, insects and other species I can't name right now...)
The bulk update request #13660 is pending approval.
create implication missing_all_limbs (173) -> missing_all_legs (482)
create implication missing_all_limbs (173) -> missing_all_arms (726)
Reason:
yummytummysketties said:
Is it possible to include missing_all_limbs?
I said in another forum but "all" can work for characters with more than 5 limbs. (taurs, insects and other species I can't name right now...)
Edit: There may be creatures with only legs or arms so maybe imply missing_all_limbs -> missing_limb might be better...
Updated
