Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #71189 maleherm -> vaginal has been rejected.
Reason: (First time making community suggestions, hopefully I'm not that bad)
Too often we see maleherm tag being missused for characters that are actually gynomorph or herm.
This implication would combat the misstagged gynomorph.
EDIT: The tag implication maleherm -> vaginal (forum #481342) has been rejected by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
1. vaginal is for posts depicting any activity relating to the vulva, not the vulva itself.
2. The vulva does not necessarily need to be visible to determine that a character is a maleherm. Context clues can inform gender tags.
3. This would not actually stop people from putting maleherm on posts that shouldn't have it. It would just increase the amount of posts that are mistagged with vaginal.
The tag implication maleherm -> vaginal (forum #481342) has been rejected by @spe.
