The bulk update request #13281 is pending approval.
create implication arms_tied_behind_back (1013) -> arms_tied (28620)
create implication arms_tied_behind_back (1013) -> hands_behind_back (44044)
Reason: Should exist already.
Topic: arms_tied_behind_back BUR
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Hey, should I change this to alias arms_tied to hands_tied?
The reason I have it set to implicate hands_behind_back is because arms_behind_back got aliased to hands_behind_back, so should arms_tied_behind_back be aliased into hands_tied_behind_back?
peskeon said:
Hey, should I change this to alias arms_tied to hands_tied?
The reason I have it set to implicate hands_behind_back is because arms_behind_back got aliased to hands_behind_back, so should arms_tied_behind_back be aliased into hands_tied_behind_back?
I'd say leave as-is, as it's possible to have your arms tied without your hands being tied as well.