Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #71166 minecraft_sheep_fucker -> minecraft is pending approval.
Reason: The tag is about a contraption players can build in Minecraft.
While I'm here I'd like to see people's opinions about whether this tag should apply to posts that are about the machine but don't depict it, e.g. post #5585305. I was going to do an implication for fucking_machine as well but decided against it for this reason.
eightoflakes said:
The tag implication #71166 minecraft_sheep_fucker -> minecraft is pending approval.Reason: The tag is about a contraption players can build in Minecraft.
While I'm here I'd like to see people's opinions about whether this tag should apply to posts that are about the machine but don't depict it, e.g. post #5585305. I was going to do an implication for fucking_machine as well but decided against it for this reason.
I'm not sure, but I think no on tagging minecraft_sheep_fucker to posts that don't directly depict it due to Tag What You See and I see an anthro pink sheep in a picture of minecraft asking "what that piston is for?"
Not even the following image where she's wearing a shirt that says "I survived the contraption 2025" can fully remove the doubt from my mind that the (offscreen) piston is for a redstone obstacle course and THAT'S "the contraption" she "survived".
As for the tag itself... yes, I do believe that all minecraft_sheep_fuckers at least have to have a minecraft piston, and thus should be tagged minecraft. If it doesn't have the piston nor the boat, it's not a minecraft_sheep_fucker.
Updated
Wouldn't it be possible to depict a non-Minecraft version of the machine? It originally being built in Minecraft as a meme I don't think necessitates all depictions have Minecraft visible for tagging purposes.
The fact that it's worded as Minecraft Sheep Fucker does make it seem like it "should be tagged Minecraft." I feel like switching that to something more appropriate would help avoid that misconception. Piston Fuck Machine or something?
post #6183353 post #6137336
Looking under fucking machine, there are plenty that use what appears to be a piston-powered dildo, some even having a "wide platform" like the Minecraft version.
watsit said:
Wouldn't it be possible to depict a non-Minecraft version of the machine? It originally being built in Minecraft as a meme I don't think necessitates all depictions have Minecraft visible for tagging purposes.
What do you think a non-Minecraft version of the machine would look like? What makes that different from a regular fucking machine?
eightoflakes said:
What do you think a non-Minecraft version of the machine would look like? What makes that different from a regular fucking machine?
Which raises the question, is the tag for the machine, or for the meme? The tag's currently in the copyright category, suggesting the latter. Or if it's meant to be for the machine, then what does make it different from "a fucking_machine in the style of Minecraft"?
In the former case, it would be possible to reference the meme without depicting minecraft. In the latter case, that doesn't sound like a good tag and should be aliased away.
Though in regards to the meme, I have to wonder what exactly it entails? A piston-powered contraption that's used to surprise-penetrate someone's orifices is an idea that's existed for a long time. I remember seeing a video a couple years ago for Monster Hunter World about a piston-powered spear contraption being used to thrust into a rathalos' ass, which went around as a bit of a meme, and this seems to be the same concept just in Minecraft with a sheep.
eightoflakes said:
What do you think a non-Minecraft version of the machine would look like? What makes that different from a regular fucking machine?
