Topic: [REJECTED] Add implications to Character Jag

The bulk update request #13208 has been rejected.

Reason: Imply descriptions of the character Jag

EDIT: The bulk update request #13208 (forum #480040) has been rejected by @ItsJag.

But what if someone was cosplaying as Jag? Or this is an AU or point in their personal timeline where these features wouldn't apply? What if you decide to do a transformation sequence in which he's not portrayed as a fox? There's several reasons why we don't imply a character to specific traits like species, genders, or physical features, as they can legitimately be portrayed in ways in which these traits aren't applicable or visible, including lore.

In principle, we do not imply individual features to character tags due to the reasons @Clawstripe mentioned above.
There is no way to make sure all of those features would be present on every piece of artwork with that character, be it in the present or the future.

Even if you decide to manually blanket tag all of those features to every post with Jag, you could potentially violate TWYS and be punished for Tagging Abuse for adding tags that are invalid/not visually apparent.

Even just something as simple as the character wearing shoes and gloves or facing away from viewer or having eyes closed would cause multiple tags from this list to not apply.

ruppari said:
Even just something as simple as the character wearing shoes and gloves or facing away from viewer or having eyes closed would cause multiple tags from this list to not apply.

Or any color tags if someone drew a black and white pic as well.

The bulk update request #13208 (forum #480040) has been rejected by @ItsJag.

Tip: you can add those tags to your 'frequent tags' in advanced settings, then when uploading if you click any of the related tag categories they will pop up under quick tags.

Just be sure to double check they all apply and don't just blindly add them all.