Topic: how do i find more of the things i like?

Posted under Off Topic

okay this is gonna sound weirdly specific but hear me out. I'm looking for art where someone is inflated/expanded to the point of immobilization, BUT their upper body, their arms in particular, are partially or entirely uninflated. is there a tag I've neglected to search for this? I've tried pear inflation, pear shaped figure, belly expansion and all of its variants... is there some obscure one that's specifically relating to people that look like those wobbling punching bag things that I'm missing? it's kinda frustrating having a weirdly obscure thing you wanna see in art. (sorry if this is something too explicit to post about. I'm just a little miffed)

thegreatwolfgang said:
You can try the pinned topic #23085 if you are unsure if a tag like that exists.

Always wondered, How effective is that thread in finding tags/ How many peeps use it?
Seems like a lot of peeps skip it altogether, ya know, Dood?
╹ ╹)

notkastar said:
Always wondered, How effective is that thread in finding tags/ How many peeps use it?
Seems like a lot of peeps skip it altogether, ya know, Dood?
╹ ╹)

There is a higher chance of things getting missed if people posted separately like this, especially when it gets bumped down by more recent topics or by admins processing AIBURs.
Meanwhile, while it is not guaranteed you would find an answer, posting in the dedicated thread would keep everything in one single place and make it easier for more knowledgable users to access and answer.

thegreatwolfgang said:
There is a higher chance of things getting missed if people posted separately like this, especially when it gets bumped down by more recent topics or by admins processing AIBURs.
Meanwhile, while it is not guaranteed you would find an answer, posting in the dedicated thread would keep everything in one single place and make it easier for more knowledgable users to access and answer.

Totally! Just worried with only have one place to post that it's get washed away by
a previous conversation saying, "This isn't what I'm looking for, and do you know ____?"
the previous guy replies, and the comment in the middle gets overlooked as interrupting.
And, Do peeps check that thread regularly to answer questions, or is it full of unfulfilled
questions, Dood?

(Promise I'm not arguing, 'Just you seem like one of the most knowledgeable and attentive
peeps and if anyone would know these things, You'd be one, I would guess, Dood! ╹‿╹)~★

notkastar said:
Totally! Just worried with only have one place to post that it's get washed away by
a previous conversation saying, "This isn't what I'm looking for, and do you know ____?"
the previous guy replies, and the comment in the middle gets overlooked as interrupting.
And, Do peeps check that thread regularly to answer questions, or is it full of unfulfilled
questions, Dood?

(Promise I'm not arguing, 'Just you seem like one of the most knowledgeable and attentive
peeps and if anyone would know these things, You'd be one, I would guess, Dood! ╹‿╹)~★

Similarly to the Find The Artist/Source/Image Request Thread, there are definitely a lot of both unanswered and resolved questions.

I don't personally browse through those threads on a regular basis, but I do believe there are some who do so.
It can be helpful at times when someone actually does have an answer to your questions, but an answer is not always guaranteed.

thegreatwolfgang said:
Similarly to the Find The Artist/Source/Image Request Thread, there are definitely a lot of both unanswered and resolved questions.

I don't personally browse through those threads on a regular basis, but I do believe there are some who do so.
It can be helpful at times when someone actually does have an answer to your questions, but an answer is not always guaranteed.

I see, I see.
But making a thread in case your question is not answered there is ill-advised, right?
Less you be pointed back there for round two, Dood?

notkastar said:
I see, I see.
But making a thread in case your question is not answered there is ill-advised, right?
Less you be pointed back there for round two, Dood?

Correct. You'd just be pointed right back to that particular thread.

clawstripe said:
Correct. You'd just be pointed right back to that particular thread.

Ah~ Gotcha gotcha! Summed up, there or look outside of the forums.
Thanks a bunch for the info and sorry if my text is a bit garbled,
Dyslexia is run when proofreading doesn't work from time to time
and extensions miss it too, Dood.
T‿T)

thanks for the help lol. I'm really new to the site so I don't really know all the ins and outs of how things work here. thanks for being so nice!