Topic: Tag implication: feline_demon -> feline

The tag implication #71089 feline_demon -> feline is pending approval.

Reason: A feline demon is a demon who is a feline.

are felines enough of a notable enough portion of demons to warrant a separate tag? canine demons get a tag because of the existence of hellhounds, snd caprine features are extremely common in demons generally and there are notable demons like baphomet, I'm not sure if the same is true for felines.

dba_afish said:
…

Well, I mean… Krampus_(species) is aliased to goat_demon which is implicated to caprine_demon which is implicated to caprine, so shouldn't the same logic apply?

dba_afish said:
are felines enough of a notable enough portion of demons to warrant a separate tag? canine demons get a tag because of the existence of hellhounds, snd caprine features are extremely common in demons generally and there are notable demons like baphomet, I'm not sure if the same is true for felines.

Something something precedent something something...

I still maintain demon itself is too vague and subjective a tag, and should instead be tagging demonic as an adjective for things that more wholly align with modern demonic iconography. <species>_demon tags end up being tagged largely by lore, characters are tagged it because the series they're from call them that, as non-demons can share any of the same visual identifiers and not be tagged <species>_demon.