Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: fleshlight_gag -> penetrable_sex_toy_in_mouth

The tag implication #68439 fleshlight_gag -> penetrable_sex_toy_in_mouth has been rejected.

Reason: This isn't just for the "fleshlight_gag" tag, but also "cocksleeve_in_mouth" and "donut_mouth". I've noticed that these all tend to follow the similar pattern and theme of some sort of fleshlight-like device placed within the mouth of a character. I did submit this as an alias, but I think this works better as an implication.

EDIT: The tag implication fleshlight_gag -> penetrable_sex_toy_in_mouth (forum #458506) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

What about when the fleshlight gag isn't being worn?

nin10dope said:
What about when the fleshlight gag isn't being worn?

Not sure. I guess the normal "penetrable_sex_toy" tag?

ike-x01 said:
Not sure. I guess the normal "penetrable_sex_toy" tag?

That would be a better target for implication

The tag implication fleshlight_gag -> penetrable_sex_toy_in_mouth (forum #458506) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

The bulk update request #13514 is active.

create implication fleshlight_gag (348) -> penetrable_sex_toy (10570)

Reason: What do people think about this version?

EDIT: The bulk update request #13514 (forum #484367) has been approved by @furrypickle.

The bulk update request #13514 (forum #484367) has been approved by @furrypickle.

Shouldn't it be penetrable_sex_toy_gag? I thought we're avoiding fleshlight as a copyright instead of item

The bulk update request #13550 is pending approval.

mass update fleshlight_gag -> penetrable_sex_toy_gag
remove implication fleshlight_gag (348) -> penetrable_sex_toy (10570)
remove implication fleshlight_gag (348) -> gag (58615)

Reason: A bit of a mouthful, but fleshlight is a copyright, and a penetrable sex toy is a bit more than just penetrable.

See also: Alias fleshlight_gag -> penetrable gag