Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: cum_in_beverage -> cum_in_a_cup

The tag implication #68327 cum_in_beverage -> cum_in_a_cup has been rejected.

Reason: Just from a quick scan, there isn't a single image tagged with this that doesn't involve a cup/mug/glass of some kind.

EDIT: The tag implication cum_in_beverage -> cum_in_a_cup (forum #457090) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

unknowntags said:
The tag implication #68327 cum_in_beverage -> cum_in_a_cup has been rejected.

Reason: Just from a quick scan, there isn't a single image tagged with this that doesn't involve a cup/mug/glass of some kind.

also, possibly also implies cum_in_food, depending if "beverage" is a subset of "food" or a separate top level category.

It is still very much possible to deposit cum into for example a bottle, tea kettle, can etc. so this is not a good idea even though there is no current conflicts.

Edit: I think better alternative would be cum_in_container.

Honestly, these two are anything but synonyms.

ruppari said:
It is still very much possible to deposit cum into for example a bottle, tea kettle, can etc.

Do we even have any of those tags? What's the level of topological granularity at which we stop distinguishing?

ruppari said:
Edit: I think better alternative would be cum_in_container.

Yes, agree this should be an implication either way (hard to have a beverage without containing it).

The tag implication cum_in_beverage -> cum_in_a_cup (forum #457090) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

The bulk update request #13505 is active.

create implication cum_in_beverage (104) -> cum_in_container (5477)

Reason: This sounds like the better fit.

EDIT: The bulk update request #13505 (forum #484224) has been approved by @furrypickle.

The bulk update request #13505 (forum #484224) has been approved by @furrypickle.