Topic: [APPROVED] Sneaker colors

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

HardShirt

Member

The bulk update request #11176 is active.

create implication green_sneakers (79) -> green_shoes (1031)
create implication yellow_sneakers (61) -> yellow_shoes (1040)
create implication grey_sneakers (44) -> grey_shoes (908)
create implication tan_sneakers (3) -> tan_shoes (114)
create implication brown_sneakers (1) -> brown_shoes (3058)
create implication white_sneakers (392) -> white_shoes (3680)
create implication blue_sneakers (183) -> blue_shoes (2099)
create implication orange_sneakers (38) -> orange_shoes (675)
create implication red_sneakers (466) -> red_shoes (5268)
create implication pink_sneakers (97) -> pink_shoes (1380)
create implication pink_sneakers (97) -> pink_shoes (1380)
create implication teal_sneakers (3) -> teal_shoes (35)
create implication black_sneakers (300) -> black_shoes (7064)
create implication green_sneakers (79) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication teal_sneakers (3) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication yellow_sneakers (61) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication grey_sneakers (44) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication tan_sneakers (3) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication brown_sneakers (1) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication white_sneakers (392) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication blue_sneakers (183) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication orange_sneakers (38) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication red_sneakers (466) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication pink_sneakers (97) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication pink_sneakers (97) -> sneakers (13524)

Reason: There are colors/sneaker type tags that don't imply sneakers. I'll just start some here.

EDIT: The bulk update request #11176 (forum #450121) has been approved by @spe.

Updated by auto moderator

HardShirt

Member

The bulk update request #11178 is pending approval.

create implication black_sneakers (300) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication torn_sneakers (13) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication torn_sneakers (13) -> torn_footwear (924)
create implication toeless_sneakers (11) -> toeless_footwear (10022)
create implication toeless_sneakers (11) -> toeless_shoes (624)
create alias open_toe_sneakers (7) -> toeless_sneakers (11)
create alias open_toed_sneakers (0) -> toeless_sneakers (11)
create implication print_sneakers (2) -> print_footwear (87)
create implication print_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> gistening_footwear (0)
create implication platform_sneakers (1) -> platform_shoes (213)
create implication platform_sneakers (1) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication two_tone_sneakers (147) -> two_tone_shoes (1131)
create implication two_tone_sneakers (147) -> multicolored_sneakers (69)
create implication multicolored_sneakers (69) -> multicolored_shoes (1644)
create implication two_tone_sneakers (147) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication knee_sneakers (14) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication discarded_sneakers (3) -> sneakers (13524)
create implication discarded_sneakers (3) -> discarded_footwear (255)
create implication purple_sneakers (47) -> purple_shoes (843)
create implication purple_sneakers (47) -> purple_shoes (843)

Reason: Continuation of previous BUR request.

NOTE: I put the wrong forum topic

spe

Admin

A few issues with the second one.

  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (11057)
  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> gistening_footwear (0)

These are weird. Only two posts and one of them doesn’t even look very glistening. Seems like a pointless tag. But if it is valid, shouldn’t it imply glistening_shoes instead? Also, gistening_footwear is a typo.

  • create implication torn_sneakers (8) -> torn_footwear (805)

Why not torn_shoes?

  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_footwear (9127)
  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_shoes (533)

These are redundant.

HardShirt

Member

spe said:
A few issues with the second one.

  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (11057)
  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> gistening_footwear (0)

These are weird. Only two posts and one of them doesn’t even look very glistening. Seems like a pointless tag. But if it is valid, shouldn’t it imply glistening_shoes instead? Also, gistening_footwear is a typo.

  • create implication torn_sneakers (8) -> torn_footwear (805)

Why not torn_shoes?

  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_footwear (9127)
  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_shoes (533)

These are redundant.

Uhm...I can look through this again

HardShirt

Member

The bulk update request #11965 is pending approval.

remove implication torn_sneakers (13) -> torn_footwear (924) # missing
create implication torn_sneakers (13) -> torn_shoes (772)
create implication torn_shoes (772) -> torn_footwear (924)
remove implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> glistening_footwear (576) # missing
create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> glistening_shoes (205)
create implication glistening_shoes (205) -> glistening_footwear (576) # duplicate of implication #36801
remove implication torn_sneakers (13) -> torn_footwear (924) # missing
create implication torn_sneakers (13) -> torn_shoes (772)
create implication torn_shoes (772) -> torn_footwear (924)

Reason: A recommended correction from spe.

Alien Fluff

Former Staff

Shouldn't there be aliases made for all these to incorporate the British English word for the shoes (i.e. trainers)?

HardShirt

Member

alien_fluff said:
Shouldn't there be aliases made for all these to incorporate the British English word for the shoes (i.e. trainers)?

Uhm...maybe. I'm not entirely sure. Someone would have to make a bulk alias. Would the admins/janitors be on board with this...idk