Topic: [APPROVED] Crustacean should not imply marine

The bulk update request #6448 is active.

remove implication crustacean (4414) -> marine (8)

Reason: Carving out isopods from marine, because this is not a marine animal:
post #4216651

There are also amphipod and crab species that are terrestrial, but identifying them in art is next to impossible and I doubt the marine tag on those would seem wrong to 99.9% of people. I don't think those are worth splitting.

Followup
implicate shrimp -> marine implicate branchipod -> marine implicate maxillopod -> marine implicate decapodian_(futurama) -> marine implicate mudcrab -> marine implicate mantis_shrimp -> marine implicate krill -> marine implicate decapoda -> marine implicate amphipod -> marine implicate opossum_shrimp -> marine implicate paguroid -> marine implicate tongue_eating_louse -> marine implicate giant_isopod -> marine

EDIT: The bulk update request #6448 (forum #389837) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6448 (forum #389837) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6620 is active.

remove implication crustacean_humanoid (263) -> marine_humanoid (7271)

Reason: Same thing for humanoids + a couple missing implications.
implicate shrimp_humanoid -> marine_humanoid implicate crab_humanoid -> marine_humanoid implicate lobster_humanoid -> marine_humanoid implicate isopod_humanoid -> crustacean_humanoid implicate mantis_shrimp_humanoid -> marine_humanoid implicate mantis_shrimp_humanoid -> crustacean_humanoid

EDIT: The bulk update request #6620 (forum #391411) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #6620 (forum #391411) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #6799 is active.

create implication shrimp (735) -> marine (8)
create implication branchipod (0) -> marine (8)
create implication maxillopod (327) -> marine (8)
create implication decapodian_(futurama) (69) -> marine (8)
create implication mudcrab (5) -> marine (8)
create implication mantis_shrimp (59) -> marine (8)
create implication krill (0) -> marine (8)
create implication decapoda (9) -> marine (8)
create implication amphipod (2) -> marine (8)
create implication opossum_shrimp (0) -> marine (8)
create implication paguroid (2) -> marine (8)
create implication tongue-eating_louse (13) -> marine (8)
create implication giant_isopod (28) -> marine (8)

Reason: Followup
implicate shrimp_humanoid -> marine_humanoid implicate crab_humanoid -> marine_humanoid implicate lobster_humanoid -> marine_humanoid implicate isopod_humanoid -> crustacean_humanoid implicate mantis_shrimp_humanoid -> marine_humanoid implicate mantis_shrimp_humanoid -> crustacean_humanoid
Doesn't seem to work because of some residual implications not clearing
For example crustacean_humanoid -> marine but not marine_humanoid

The bulk update request #6799 (forum #392778) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6873 is active.

create implication shrimp_humanoid (66) -> marine_humanoid (7271)
create implication crab_humanoid (99) -> marine_humanoid (7271)
create implication lobster_humanoid (14) -> marine_humanoid (7271)
create implication isopod_humanoid (14) -> crustacean_humanoid (263)
create implication mantis_shrimp_humanoid (14) -> marine_humanoid (7271)
create implication mantis_shrimp_humanoid (14) -> crustacean_humanoid (263)

Reason: Followup

EDIT: The bulk update request #6873 (forum #393393) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6873 (forum #393393) has been approved by @slyroon.

The tag implication mantis_shrimp -> marine has been rejected by @spe.

The tag implication opossum_shrimp -> marine has been rejected by @furrypickle.

Note: this one didn't fully transfer over when marine was aliased to aquatic, so I rejected it manually to fix it manually. However, looking closer, it also already gets implied to aquatic through shrimp, so this was duplicate. And it has never actually been used as a tag ever apparently? Which is odd.