Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: pussy_tape -> pussy

The tag implication #38502 pussy_tape -> vulva has been rejected.

Reason: Should be fairly obvious

EDIT: The tag implication pussy_tape -> pussy (forum #309102) has been rejected by @Millcore.

post #2026034
Nah.

Do we tag underwear with genitalia because that's what it's covering, too?

What...? The idea of pussy tape is that it's tape covering the pussy. As in, you can't see it. Sometimes it might be being pulled off, or a not covering it all the way, but it certainly should not be implied.

Edit: Perhaps you were thinking of pussy_spreading_tape? That's tape used to spread a pussy, not to cover one.

lafcadio said:
post #2026034
Nah.

I voted YAY, but now I think NAY

closetpossum said:
I voted YAY, but now I think NAY

You can change your vote.

votp said:

closetpossum said:
I voted YAY, but now I think NAY

You can change your vote.

Just click the uncolored Thumbs Up icon and it'll remove your vote so you can cast a different one.

The tag implication pussy_tape -> pussy (forum #309102) has been rejected by @Millcore.