Topic: Tag implication: horizontal_pussy -> pussy

The tag implication #38460 horizontal_vulva -> vulva has been rejected.

Reason: Seems simple enough.

EDIT: The tag implication horizontal_pussy -> pussy (forum #308438) has been rejected by @Millcore.

Under what circumstances would we use horizontal_pussy instead of cloaca?

thirtyeight said:
Under what circumstances would we use horizontal_pussy instead of cloaca?

A cloaca is a combined anus/pussy (or anus/genital_slit). A horizontal_pussy with a distinct anus wouldn't be a cloaca.

watsit said:
A cloaca is a combined anus/pussy (or anus/genital_slit). A horizontal_pussy with a distinct anus wouldn't be a cloaca.

Can you provide an example where that's the case? I doubt there are enough cases to justify a separate tag.

My vote is -1 to implicate
+1 to alias

thirtyeight said:
Can you provide an example where that's the case? I doubt there are enough cases to justify a separate tag.

post #2686884 post #2682235 post #2682189 post #2680380 post #2679188
These have all been in the past month. There are some that seem to be missing a visible anus and could classify as horizontal_cloaca instead, but it seems there's a decent amount that's clearly not a cloaca, and it's a distinctive feature some people may or may not want to see.

Shouldnt be aliased because Cloacas are not Vulvas.
A quick look at the tag is enough to show that off.
post #2657246 post #1597227 post #1232758 post #2682235
The problem is bad as is, doesnt need to be made worse. Implication is right.