Topic: Tag Implication: big_hero_6 -> disney

Implicating big_hero_6 → disney
Link to implication

Reason:

Movie's from Disney

While it's made by disney, shouldn't it also implicate marvel?
It's a Marvel superhero team, after all.

It predates the Disney movie with non-Disney comics right

Lance_Armstrong said:
It predates the Disney movie with non-Disney comics right

Arguable. The team existed since 1998, but the versions appearing here are likely to only be recent ones from the Disney movie.

Random said:
Arguable. The team existed since 1998, but the versions appearing here are likely to only be recent ones from the Disney movie.

"Likely" isn't enough for an implication. Remember, it is impossible to remove an implied tag without removing either the tag that implies the tag in question or the implication itself.

As far as I can tell, everything currently tagged is the Disney movie and it seems unlikely that the older comic series will have any content posted to here. Additionally, Marvel is owned by Disney...so that kind of complicates things a bit. Therefore, I'm making the following proposal:

• Implication: baymax -> big_hero_6 (pending)
• Implication: big_hero_6 -> disney (pending)
• Implication: baymax_(marvel) -> marvel (pending) - For future taggers
• Implication: big_hero_6_(marvel) -> marvel (pending) - Probably not needed

This may require slightly more cleaning (maybe), but this is another option:

• Implication: baymax_(disney) -> big_hero_6_(film) (pending)
• Implication: big_hero_6_(film) -> disney (pending)

Since Marvel is owned by Disney and Baymax isn't hugely relevant on this site, I don't see much of a problem with it all going to disney. Particularly since everything posted here is from the new Disney movie anyways. Therefore, I've made the following changes:

• Implication: baymax -> big_hero_6 (approved)
• Implication: big_hero_6 -> disney (approved)
• Implication: baymax_(marvel) -> marvel (denied) - Unused
• Implication: big_hero_6_(marvel) -> marvel (denied) - Unused